You should also check out the first MacBook Air and iPad Pro benchmark scores. While the Mac Pro has faster GPUs, meaning it still beats the new mini in terms of GPU-accelerated tasks, like video editing, no Macs beat the mini’s footprint, silent operation and price. While much of the speed gains provided by the new mini stem from the fact that it wasn’t upgraded for a bunch of years, this is currently without a doubt the best Mac model in terms of value.įor just $1,099 for the “pro” edition, the new Mac mini is a much better value than the base $1,199 model of the new MacBook Air which scored 4,091 and 7,693 in single-core and multi-core performance, respectively.Īnd with a $200 CPU upgrade, it offers more CPU power than the aging Mac Pro. Apple has underscored that the updated Mac mini does not use the slower, less powerful mobile editions of the Intel CPU and graphics.įor Mac mini fans out there, this is all just wonderful news. As I said, additional benchmarks and side-by-side real-world testing would be needed to make any definite conclusions.īy comparison, the 2018 MacBook Pro models range from 4,505 to 5,344 in single-core performance and about 8,831 to 22,556 in multi-core, depending on configuration. “But if the numbers were averaged together, the new Mac mini would be closer in performance to a high-end laptop than a powerful desktop,” he said. The author speculates the discrepancy could be due to some other process running at the same time as the first test. A second benchmark posted just a few minutes earlier shows a single-core score of 5,070 and a multi-core score of 16,818. Use the Geekbench Browser to organize your Geekbench benchmark results and. Take these scores with a grain of salt: we need more benchmarks before claiming that the new mini is faster than the mid-range Mac Pro. Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch, Intel chip 2880×1800 iMac Pro 3440x1440,4k. In other words, the latest Mac mini offers the same CPU performance as the more than three times expensive Mac Pro which, by the way, does not offer DIY upgrades like the new mini does. Apple’s higher-end 12-core Mac Pro and four separate configurations of the iMac Pro all easily outperform the Mac mini, albeit at much higher prices.īy comparison, the 2013 Mac Pro starts at $3,799. The first Geekbench result is the strongest, showing a single-core score of 5,512 which eclipses all Mac models save for the latest four-core 4.2GHz iMac, plus a multi-core score of 23,516 placing the Mac mini at the same general performance level as a mid-range configuration of the Intel Xeon-based Mac Pro, which runs eight cores at 3.0GHz. For everything else, there's the Intel Core i9-13980HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX.Apple’s Mac mini was refreshed last week and it’s quite a beast, according to the first Geekbench 4 synthetic benchmark scores pertaining to the pricier $1,099 model upgraded to an optional six-core 3.2GHz Intel Core i7 processor, resulting in a $1,299 configuration.Īccording to VentureBeat, which first spotted the new Geekbench CPU scores for a “Macmini8,1” model featuring an Intel Core i7-8700B CPU running at 3.2GHz with six cores. Optimization Settings Set the Performance setting to Faster Mac OS. That said, the M2 Pro and M2 Max should offer enough processing power to chew through most video-related workloads. Optimize Parallels Desktop How We Test We will use Geekbench 2.1.10 and CINEBENCH. With no M2 Ultra coming anytime soon, the M2 Max will be the best Apple SoC on the market, at least until the 3 nm M3 and its derivatives are out and about. One can attribute the M2 Pro's stellar performance increase in part to Apple's chip designing prowess and the improved TSMC N5P node it is manufactured on. Even the better-specced M1 Max (1,780/12,656) falls flat against the M2 Pro, although an apples-to-apples comparison between the two would be unfair given the latter features two extra E cores.Furthermore, Geekbench is a CPU-intensive test and the M1 Max will almost certainly flex its muscles in a more GPU-bound scenario. We ran a few different benchmarks across. That represents a 10% increase over the last-gen M1 Pro (1,769/12,499) in single-core performance and a 20% increment in multi-core. Compare this to our Mac Pro model with a 16-core Intel Xeon W, and across our CPU benchmarks, there was really no contest: the Xeon is outclassed. The Apple M2 Pro scores 1,952 and 15,013 points in the Geekbench single and multi-core tests, respectively. It has shown up on the benchmarking platform (via MacRumors) alongside a Mac Mini. Nonetheless, the M2 Pro is shaping up to be quite the powerhouse, as confirmed by a recent Geekbench listing. Usually, Apple reveals its hardware with much fanfare and one can't help but wonder why this launch was so low-key. Apple's decision to silently launch its new M2 Pro and M2 Max SoCs come off as a tad puzzling.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |